A piece I am proud to present, which was written two weeks back now. 
One&Other gave me some wriggle room and - following the HMV crises - allowed me to write something that I hope will provoke discussion:
“For
 a collector – and I mean a real collector, a collector as he ought to 
be – ownership is the most intimate relationship that one can have to 
objects”. Walter Benjamin, 1992.
Yesterday I sat in my usual 
pub, in my usual chair by the fireplace. I took a swig of scotch and 
tensed as the burn caught the back of my throat. Across the room two of 
the regulars were locking horns. After several minutes tones elevate and
 hands flail, moving light-hearted gents’ banter into a full-blown war: 
in one corner, the traditionalist – unkempt and sporting a Genesis 
t-shirt and a Walkman held together with tape; in the other corner, the 
modernist – white ear buds hanging from his shirt collar, using names 
like ‘Spotify’ and ‘Apple’ as verbal cannon fodder. The fact is that 
debates over the format and distribution of music have moved beyond the 
realm of barstool chatter to serious academic exchanges, and as such, my
 mind was in two camps when I was asked to write this article. My first 
thought was that somebody somewhere must have placed a serious bounty on
 my head in approaching such a contentious topic; the second was simply 
‘where the devil am I to start’? It is very easy to sound evangelical 
when discussing physicality in record buying, however, and without 
wanting to come across too academic, I will endeavour to avoid too many 
jingoisms. That said, as I sit now in a room replete with CD cases, dust
 jackets and cassette boxes, I suppose it is fairly obvious on which 
side of the fence I reside. When HMV announced its administration 
earlier this month, my personal Facebook and Twitter accounts were rife 
with sobs from friends – those who defected to online outlets still 
found themselves mourning the loss of Britain’s most recognised 
multimedia store. It has always been de rigueur amongst music diehards 
to belittle the franchise for its commerciality and unashamedly 
mainstream focus, but because of that very position in their 
consciousness, its demise has been a hammer blow to both high-street and
 independent record buyers alike. For those of us who still enjoy 
filling our shelves, we appear more determined than ever to cling on to 
high-fidelity means of music consumption.
In record purchasing, 
ownership is a highly tactile, conspicuous experience. The act of 
physically ‘picking up’ your item and paying for it – or vice-versa, if 
you’re using a website – is a strangely personal one; the £9.99 exchange
 leaves you with something you can touch, an acquisition an experience 
in its own right. Whatever your poison, an album sleeve potentially 
colours your listening – from the fantastical landscapes of Roger Dean 
[Yes] to the stark brilliance of Peter Saville [Joy Division], the 
listener can choose to envelope themselves sonically and visually within
 something tangible, that really is theirs. A far cry came in September 
last year when the Sunday Times published an article challenging our 
ideas of ownership in digital music consumption. Silver screen veteran 
and known music collector Bruce Willis allegedly sought legal action 
upon discovering that his extensive iTunes library would revert to Apple
 when he dies, unable to pass it on to his family. Though the lawsuit 
was promptly dispelled as folklore, the article provoked quite a 
reaction with readers learning that those files and folders didn’t 
actually belong to them.
When discussing purchasing, I used the 
second adjective for a reason: coined by economist Thorstein Veblen in 
1899, ‘conspicuous consumption’ is something increasingly practised by 
high-fidelity listeners as we find ourselves fighting against the 
digital market. I am certainly guilty, with the mere mention of 
‘download’ forcing my hand toward the nearest shop like some unwieldy 
defence mechanism. Satirically depicted in Nick Hornby’s ‘High 
Fidelity’, the image of the collector has become one of near 
introversion: scribbling names, thoughts and dates in a little black 
book, unwilling to accept the ever-changing outside world. That is the 
cliché, and it can be construed as shallow to some.
Philosopher Walter 
Benjamin, from whom I take my tagline, postulated that our collections 
form a ‘material biography’ – that our dusty shelves reveal something 
unique about us as people. Indeed, my own personal record collection 
maps a trajectory that underpins the best part of a decade. Record 
ownership is profoundly social, a game of join the dots if you will. In 
my first year of university, I played a record by Pink Floyd to a guy I 
met at a mixer; the next day he came in with a CD case in his hand, 
threw it down onto my bed and said ‘dig this, man – David Gilmour 
produced it!’ Like a scene from ‘High Fidelity’, this is a record I can 
date with a snapshot of my personal history; a reminder of my first days
 as a freshman. Numerous sociological studies have been conducted to 
show that digital music libraries can also house such biographies – 
Marjorie Kibby’s ‘Collect Yourself’ warrants further exploration. 
However, there is nothing as ephemeral as that which can be erased by 
pressing a key, casting it off into a silicon no-man’s-land. Record or 
even CDs can decay physically just like their owners – scuffs, worn 
jackets or a mysterious stain – but ultimately continue to turn with the
 aid of the right mechanics.
The wealth of music open to the 
digital user is unprecedented – between legal and illegal sources there 
exists a boundless, readily available catalogue. Whether it is the 
instant gratification this medium provides, or perhaps that you have 
access to hours of music without risking disappointment, the appeal is 
easy to see: ‘every song you have ever owned in your pocket’ is enticing
 and liberating, waving goodbye to your cluttered, cobwebbed storage 
spaces. Having no fixed location frees us to take our music on the move,
 creating a mobile, ‘imperfect sanctuary’ in which to reside as we 
traverse our environments.
The choice afforded by your friendly 
neighbourhood record shop is always going to trumped by, say, the Apple 
store, but like the self-service supermarket, an interface can only take
 us so far before we require the services of a sentient being. Software 
can offer us suggestions, but it cannot ‘recommend’ to us in the same 
way; your local record junkie is always on hand to say ‘hey man, if you 
like this band, try the guitarist’s new solo album’ – if the projects 
are stylistically different, it is unlikely that a buzzword-based 
computer system will make the connection.
Operating economist 
Nigel Thrift’s ‘technological unconscious’, it is only when you begin to
 analyse the complexity of the processes involved, that user-friendly 
cracks appear. If these processes fail – power cuts, computer viruses 
and the like – our collections become dormant and isolated. I will never
 forget the week I spent carefully ordering my CDs and vinyl onto a 
portable hard-drive, only to be met with the message ‘your disk has 
corrupted and is unable to complete this operation’. Suffice to say I 
haven’t bothered a second time. My record collection is my back-up, my 
hard-drive – when my mp3 player packs in, I will still have a ground 
zero to return to. Call me shallow, but I like having something I can 
point to, something of which I can say “I bought that. I sat down and 
listened to that on this stereo, with these headphones”. Above questions
 of ownership and tangibility however, stands the true vernacular; we 
simply enjoy collecting and sharing things.
I believe it is too 
dramatic a leap to say that the record as an artefact is dead, and while
 file-based formats continue to supersede, a vast cottage industry 
exists for those willing to investigate. Giving new salience to 
Benjamin’s ideas, I move to suggest that combined, these formats serve 
two distinct purposes: my digital collection is the functioning 
offspring of what is on the shelf – I can take it out with me and listen
 on the move, but always return to the original at the end of the day. 
This is the true collection, the one that I continually nurture and 
love.